El dom, 30-08-2009 a las 22:27 +0200, Torsten Bergmann escribió: > Currently pharo packages are named differently: > > - either "MyPackage" and "Tests-MyPackage" for the tests > - or "MyPackage" and "MyPackage-Tests" for the tests > - or something completely different like "GraphicsTests-Text" > > First one is used more often but not very good when > using the "alphabetize" functionality in the context > menu of the standard browser ;) > > Since the package naming scheme also affects > - the monticello repo layouts > - removal/shrink scripts (see ScriptLoader>>cleanupForProduction) > - and method category names for extensions > > we should agree on at least one to use.
I vote for the Seaside convention, summarized on: http://code.google.com/p/seaside/wiki/PackageNaming At leas, in my projects is the one I use and it sorts correctly on the package browsers and in the Monticello repos. > > Were the pros and cons of the different naming > schemes already discussed? If so is there any docu around? > I remember Lukas suggested to use the one from Seaside... > > Thx > Torsten -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
