Thanks may be I should not have tried to make the Transcript threadsafe. And may be one of these days it would be great to get a cleaner model for morphic threading.
stef > Hi, if you fork processes at a higher priority, they still throw the > error in > issue 1053. In core 10428 I more often get Instances of > UndefinedObject are > not indexable. It is trying to send size to a MultiNewParagraph > while it is > still nil. By the time the debugger opens, the object is there. > > Test case attached, although I can't get it to catch the error. Use > with > ***caution***. In the one click image it often freezes the image. > > http://n2.nabble.com/file/n3565757/NSThreadsafeTranscriptPriorityTest.st > NSThreadsafeTranscriptPriorityTest.st > > It seems like this may be the case Dale identified- "I assume that > with a > sufficiently complex test case, involving heavy background window > updates > while using some of the operations that call #displayWorldSafely a > problem > would be revealed, but there's no guarantee that a mutex would be the > solution". > > Cheers, ...Stan > > > Dale Henrichs wrote: >> >> Ready for review: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1053 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Issue-1053-Transcript-updates-from-foreground-process-not-displayed-in-Transcript-window-tp3414861p3565757.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
