Aha, thanks for the clarification. In this case, I will just work with it by loading it from Monticello :).
Cheers, Doru On 8 Sep 2009, at 08:48, Alain Plantec wrote: > Hil all, > > MorphTreeMorph and related are still not mature enough to be > considered > as part of standard widgets. This is why it is private to the settings > package. > For 1.0, I think it is better to not integrate it > Cheers > Alain > > Marcus Denker a écrit : >> On 07.09.2009, at 20:10, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It looks like in the latest Pharo images (both core and dev) the >>> MorphTreeMorph class is missing. In fact, it looks like the whole >>> System-Settings package is missing. >>> >>> Is there a reason for this? >>> >>> >> >> Hello, >> >> The settings were not used and the next version seemingly will change >> form an >> API perspective. >> >> Of course, I did not know that the package contained widgets that are >> used by >> others... >> >> Maybe we can move the MorphTreeMorph class into the package that >> contains the >> widgets? >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de >> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Beauty is where we see it." _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
