Stef,

The packaging constraint had nothing to do with Pharo.  See the [ANN] thread on 
#readStream replacing ReadStream on: (around 4 Sept).  SecureSqueak is the 
system with the apparent limitation; it really does have that constraint, it 
will not be of much use to me.

Unit tests for a serializer would be well-taken, but I will largely have to 
start over.  Choosing a filer seems to be the first step.  Squeak's 
ReferenceStream did not strike me as a good option; if you wish to argue in its 
favor, please do so.  Otherwise, I would like to see SIXX get a good 
evaluation, as well as any other options that should be considered.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane 
Ducasse
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 10:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Object serialization in Pharo


On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Simon,
>
> I wish you well and will be eager to hear progress reports.  Long ago, 
> I looked at ReferenceStream (or maybe SmartReferenceStream), and did 
> not like what I found.  IIRC, the output for simple examples was much 
> larger (of course, it might not continue to scale so
> unfavorably) compared that that produced by Dolphin's binary filer.   
> Another concern was schema changes.
>
> Dolphin has an orderly conversion process that will raise an error if 
> it is not prepared for what it finds; Squeak seemed to want to fix it 
> itself with the aid of the user (not gonna fly in an end-user app or a 
> server process, which is pretty much everything).
>
> Dolphin locates conversion methods in the class of the object being 
> converted or in the class of a proxy for it (that sounded scary to me 
> when I read about it, but it is exactly what one would want in 
> practice).  In contrast, Squeak puts the conversion methods in 
> ReferenceStream.  Yuk!!!  Sorry, don't know what just came over me :)  
> Of course one can always modify ReferenceStream[*], but imagine the 
> chaos if ReferenceStream were to become widely used.
>
> I have used serializers to good effect and would like to continue 
> doing so.  At the moment, I would look again, but would lean away from 
> ReferenceStream.

I started to write some tests in the PharoTaskForces.
If people want to join effort because before changing I would like to know what 
is there.

> SIXX (an XML serializer) is a possibility.  As I recall, its output 
> was not terse (but might compress nicely??).  There originally was 
> minimal to no support for shape changes, but that has been addressed; 
> I cannot speak for how well it has been done because I have not had 
> time to look.  It is on my todo list and might float to the surface 
> soon, though initially I would not need to care about shape changes.
>
> HTH
>
> Bill
>
>
> [*] I think we recently discussed a Squeak fork that would not allow 
> touching base classes due to packaging limitations.

really?

> Not good.  I am not defending the ReferenceStream example, but it 
> would be a big problem on that system, if I understood that thread.

I would like to fix that
We need a good object serializer.


>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]
> ] On Behalf Of Simon Denier
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:32 AM
> To: Pharo Development
> Subject: [Pharo-project] Object serialization in Pharo
>
> Hi folks
>
> I'm looking at the code and comments of ReferenceStream for object 
> serialization and I wonder what is the best strategy to serialize a 
> partial model. I mean, I want to store all elements found while 
> traversing the graph of the model, but I dont want to store some 
> attributes of those elements (i.e., transient attributes).
>
> Any sample?
>
> --
>  Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to