Basically yes, but for that we just need a way to manage Pharo versions. So, as long as we can say what Pharo 1.0 is, we should be able to do that.
Cheers, Doru On 16 Sep 2009, at 13:29, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Ok but for pharo1.0 it would be nice to have it :) > then after we plug metacello underneath > > Doru with metacello will we be able to say > I want to load in the past the version of moose which worked with > pharo1.0 > even if now I'm working on pharo 3.2 (the real future :)) > > Stef > On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Damien Cassou wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I believe Metacello is a very nice piece of work and it should be a >>> very strong contender for managing releases. The ui tools are not >>> quite there yet, but it works very nicely for allowing someone to >>> specify the exact configuration to be loaded. >> >> I agree. Universes is cool but: >> >> - it requires a dedicated server and only few people installed one >> already >> - it only allows one administrator per package description >> - the interface is well... not very nice :-) >> - we would need to create a new universe from scratch >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> >> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >> popular by not having them." James Iry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- www.tudorgirba.com "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done." _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
