They probably moved while we got stuck. This is all the story behind pharo: moving again.
>>> Lua is SLOW :) >> >>> But still - you can go and see the speed comparison of different >>> numerical algorythms implemented in different languages. >>> Squeak leaves Lua far behind.. >> That sounds like FUD. >> But, maybe I misunderstand you here. >> >> However, Lua 5.x is FAST, especially for an interpreted language. Its >> register-based implementation seems to be much better for >> interpretation in terms of speed than the stack-based bytecode in >> Squeak. >> >> See: >> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=lua&lang2=squeak&box=1 >> > Hmm.. it looks like im wrong. Because couple years back it was slower. > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
