Great!

Stef

On Sep 20, 2009, at 8:36 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:

> hah! ok, no that wasn't what i expected. that will be why stef's image
> dies. but i guess i was lucky when i tried it.
> let me test out a new script and i will repost.
>
> cheers,
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>>> No, the fixes are not dependent on Gofer. I am just using it to  
>>> script
>>> the load.  There's been a lot of chat about Gofer - i had no idea  
>>> what
>>> it was. so i figured i'd use it for something!
>>
>> Looks cool.
>>
>> However, from your comments I doubt that Gofer does what you expect.
>> Gofer does not load the packages in the order specified, but instead
>> merges the contents of all specified packages into one single load
>> operation. From the comments in the script I think that every Part 1
>> to 9 should all use their own Gofer instance to be truly sequential.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to