just forgot to indicate the entry point. In order to open the setting browser: SystemSettingBrowser open.
Cheers Alain Alain Plantec a écrit : > Hi all, > I've changed the new setting implementation. > The new proposition is attached. > I think that this implementation is in sync with Lukas remarks; > and yes, I think it is much better now, thanks! > I also removed PragmaHandler and SettingHandler classes as Stephane > suggested. > It temporarily includes several (stupid) examples for testing purpose. > Comments have not yet been changed. > I will do it asap. > Remarks, comments etc are welcome. > Cheers > Alain > > Lukas Renggli a écrit : >>> - A setting with value is an instance of SettingValue or of one of its >>> subclasses. Such a setting holds a useful global system parameter and >>> is made persistent: it is stored in a class variable which is >>> initialized by the method that declares the setting. >>> >> >> I think the problem with this proposal is that it mixes the model (the >> value of the setting) and the meta-model (the model of the setting). >> This is problematic because then all code depends on the settings >> package and when reading/writing settings application code must be >> aware of the indirection introduced through the setting. >> >> Why isn't a setting simply a variable local to the package, and the >> setting-description a separate object (method) that can also be >> packaged separately? >> Lukas >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
