> This is confusing for me.
this is simple ScriptLoader should be named
ThePrivateClassIntegratorUseToIntegrateAndManageRelease
> Maybe the Pharo board should take a decision now in order to the
> community to push it. There are:
>
> ChangeSets
ok to keep to manage simple changes
> ScriptLoader
private don't use don't look at it is crap (I wrote)
> Monticello alone
ok
> Monticello configurations
ok
> Metacello
will manage group of packages and projects based on Monticello
> Installer
to script different code input
> Gofer
to script Monticello
> They share a lot of overlapped functionality. Some scripts use one of
> them, some other. This confuse the developers and the community. Maybe
> now is the moment to discuss the tools in order to polish them and use
> them, at leas until a new tool arrives that is better than the used by
> Pharo.
>
> You said that ScriptLoader will not be part of the core image but as I
> can see, only ScriptLoader and Installer can be installed directly
> from
> the web in an image that it doesn't have it.
>
> Can the community discuss this? Or the Pharo board write its opinion?
done :)
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
