yes! I could push that into the stream today but I was waiting for feedback
stef > looks good to me... but then i would say that! > > The method properties tests are now wrong, because they perform their > assertions on the AdditionalMethodState without knowing it. We could > either look to rewrite the tests to provide some test coverage for the > new class, or just delete them. I haven't looked at the highlighting > tests in depth but i know there is more work required there. it's > quite tricky, not for 1.0. I think the ability to recompile the system > and run the 7000 odd tests should give us some confidence. Obviously > some wider review would be good. > > cheers, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
