I have the impression that Sunit should be an API specification not a implementation common to all the dialect.
So I would really like to see if nial has some tests for SUnit3.2 and which ones pass and fail on pharo. Stef On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I tried to merge the changes with mcz packages that Niall prepared. >> As >> it says in the commit comment the code is broken. The difference of >> SUnit in Pharo is so substantial that almost every method was a >> conflict. I spent a few hours and tried to merge the changes >> manually, >> but in the end it did not work as expected. There are some subtle >> bugs >> in the SUnit code and some tools we have in Squeak are broken >> afterwards. > > What about replacing Pharo's SUnit by Nial's and then re-add lost > features? > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
