+1 to fix it one and for all.

Remember, from the pharo-project.org page:

"We want to create a better Smalltalk and be free to enhance it without
fear of backwards compatibility to Squeak."

This discussion is trying to achieve backwards compatibility even if
that means not fixing this bug.

So, lets fix it and as the packages are going ported to Pharo, make the
necessary changes to them. When a lot of packages (if any) are using the
new semantics, the Squeak guys might consider to use the Pharo fix.

No more discussion using the backwards compatibility argument.

-- 
Miguel Cobá
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to