I was thinking that we discuss with james foster and niall about a versions for all the smalltalk in Suni3.3 Do you recall it lukas?
On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > #expectedFailures could be implemented like this and we could support > strategies: > > TestCase class>>expectedFailures > ^ (Pragma allNamed: #expectedFailure from: self to: TestCase) > collect: [ :each | each selector ] > > Lukas > > 2009/10/1 Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>: >> Actually it would make sense to use pragmas as the information gets >> closer to the test. Any taker? >> >> Adrian >> >> On Sep 22, 2009, at 13:24 , Damien Cassou wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> How can I mark a test as being an expected failure? >>> >>> you do not need a pragma. Instead, override #expectedFailures and >>> return an array of selectors. >>> >>> -- >>> Damien Cassou >>> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >>> >>> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >>> popular by not having them." James Iry >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
