what I know is that FileDirectory code is far from suboptimal Stef
On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Please take alook at FileDirectory>>directoryContentsFor:. Does it > have any business being on the instance side of FileDirectory? It > looks like it _completely_ ignores the receiver and if anything > should be a class method somewhere, or changed to work relative to a > receiver, or something. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
