I like the ability I have to generate big and interesting threads from a little question hahaha.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Em 15/10/2009 04:50, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > I see. Eiffel ideas cross breeding Pharo Smalltalk! > > > > > The idea is that one day or later we will have to think about > > the benefit of pre and post condition. So assert: in object > > makes a lot of sense. > > > > Now indeed it would be good that all the tests use assert: > > without block and use should: for that case. > > > > Stef On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > I don't either, but I find strange the complete hierarchy of > > > classes of Pharo having a method assert: available. Perhaps > > > I'm blindfolded and Pharo and Squeak have found a wider use > > > for assertions? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
