Sig, That's fine as far as it goes, but the building blocks are useful both as concrete components and as examples of how to protect something.
Bill -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Igor Stasenko Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Thread-safe collections 2009/10/23 Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>: > Sig, > > It appears we are not going to agree. > It appears not. Thread-safe collections is too good to be true solutions for concurrency. Its too simplistic approach and in a long run , fairly ineffective. In any real-world application the basic building blocks is not generic collections, but different objects which composing your domain model. Some of your domain objects could use collections, some of them not. But you can't predict how do they using them , and in what way to state that putting thread-safe collection in use will make the whole model thread safe. And that's why i think thread-safety should be introduced at higher levels of abstractions. > Bill > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
