Em 23/10/2009 05:02, Laval Jannik <[email protected]> escreveu:

>  Hi all,
>  I would like to improve the modularity of packages in pharo.
>  A first simple thing that I  see, is methods "example" use a lot of
> things in the system.  And create cycles between packages.
>  So, I propose  to create a new package named  "Examples" and put in
> it all methods named "example2"...

I agree there are opportunities for improvement in Pharo's packages but I see 
the attempt to lump _all_ examples in a single package as a backward move.

I think a better approach would be similar to the on going discussion on the 
tests packages. We should have the package for the specific functionality, some 
convention on the test (generally Unit Test, which some argue also make as some 
part of the usage examples) related package, and some convention on example 
related package.  I would argue even further that we should have a 
documentation related package, but that will digression right now!

my .019999....

--
Cesar Rabak

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to