On Oct 26, 2009, at 15:21 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Laval Jannik
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I bring out a past message.
And my question is more general.
What do we want to keep from etoy ?
I would said NOTHING in the core or even Pharo image.
I agree with you.
However, it would be a good idea to put all the interesting eToy
stuff in an external package so that those who want to load that
stuff, are able to do it.
Is eToy maintained in Pharo ?
Because, make an external package of it needs a big work...
So, do we want a different package ? or maybe something which come
from the etoy community, something up to date.
Cheers,
Jannik
Cheers,
Jannik
On Oct 22, 2009, at 09:33 , Laval Jannik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Morph>>heading is from eToy.
> It is used to rotate a Morph.
> If we remove it, we remove the possibility to rotate a morph.
>
> What are your positions about this behavior ?
> Do we considere it as a system behavior or as an eToy thing which
> must be removed ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> ---
> Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
---
Jannik Laval
PhD Student - Rmod Team - INRIA
Certified Project Management Associate (IPMA)
http://www.jannik-laval.eu
http://rmod.lille.inria.fr
---
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
