Well, by doing that you will confuse users that only relied on the
consensual functionality of asNumber.

It's difficult both ways, and because of that, I'd suggest going the
lazy way and not helping the users other than by adding a comment to
#asNumber which explains the evolution of the  message and points to
#squeezeOutNumber. I know that the users would appreciate help in the
migration, but I don't see a non-obtrusive way to do so.

Cheers,

Niko

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Not really
>
> we could do the following
>        - check all the users of asNumber and let them as asNUmber or
> squeezeOutNumber
>        - then put a deprecation during the alpha phase that state that they
> should pay attention
>        - when we are in rc 1.1 we remove the deprecation
>        - create a package which would override it with a deprecation.
>
> stef
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Niko Schwarz wrote:
>
>> Well, what do you propose? Deprecating asNumber calls altogether?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Niko
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Yes a good deprecation is needed.
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> On Oct 24, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds ok. At the same time as integrating the change, all senders
>>>> of
>>>> asNumber in the image need to be checked and adapted to the new
>>>> semantics if necessary. IIRC MC was not properly working after the
>>>> change. Also, users and maintainers of external packages should be
>>>> made aware of the change since it may break their code.
>>>>
>>>> Adrian
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:46 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks niko
>>>>>
>>>>> So does everybody agree with
>>>>>      asNumber raising an error
>>>>>      and
>>>>>      squeezeOutNumber
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Niko Schwarz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all, I made a follow-up patch like discussed on the workshop.
>>>>>> Now
>>>>>> porting becomes as easy as changing "asNumber" to
>>>>>> "squeezeOutNumber".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Name: SLICE-issue-1258-squeezeOutNumber-NikoSchwarz.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This slice adds squeezeNumberOutOfString: to Number, as
>>>>>> discussed in
>>>>>> the Pharo workshop. On the way, it
>>>>>> fixes an issue in SqNumberParser, where it would return itself
>>>>>> rather
>>>>>> than the result of the failblack, when
>>>>>> parsing fails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, a test is added to test and document the new squeezing
>>>>>> number
>>>>>> out of strings behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example usage:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      self assert: '123blabla' squeezeOutNumber equals: 123.
>>>>>>     self assert: 'blabla123' squeezeOutNumber equals: 123.
>>>>>>     self assert: 'blabla12blabla' squeezeOutNumber equals: 12.
>>>>>>     self assert: ('12.3bla' squeezeOutNumber -12.3 ) abs < 0.0001.
>>>>>>     self assert: '.1' squeezeOutNumber > 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Niko
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 10492 (this is the stream of the branch 1.0rc1)
>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Issue 1320:   [squeak trunk] Sort the conflicts. This is
>>>>>>> required
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>> merging a distant version, like Pharo for example...
>>>>>>> - Issue 1338:   HostWindowTests>>testOne is failing in Windows
>>>>>>> - Issue 1345:   Revert Number class>>readFrom: (was integrated
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> issue 1258)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ___________________
>>>>>>> http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-
>>>>>> project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to