2009/11/1 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: > you see you find a use of Set :) >
IMO, this is a find where you should not use Set :) > Stef > > On Nov 1, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >>> Oh, wait.. you mean that if i want, say 35 out of 50 announcement >>> kinds to be logged, then >>> i need to do something like: >>> >>> logblock := [:announcement | ... ]. >>> announcer on: AnnouncementKind1 do: logblock. >>> announcer on: AnnouncementKind2 do: logblock. >>> .... >>> announcer on: AnnouncementKind35 do: logblock. >>> >>> ? >>> Do you agree that this is far from being short and elegant? Moreover >>> it imposes dependency from various kinds of events, instead of just >>> one (LoggedAnnouncement), >>> and, if i going to change them somehow, i would need to revisit this >>> code again.. and again. >> >> announcer >> on: AnnouncementKind1 , AnnouncementKind2 , ... >> AnnouncementKind35 >> do: logblock >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
