On Nov 13, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Cédrick Béler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed quite a difference between the two method who "looks" the same to
> me. Is it normal ?
>
Normal. to:do: is lnlined (compiled as jumps in the bytecode), whereas
timesRepeat: is a message
send with a closure activation.
Marcus
fun is the difference between:
(1 to : 10000) do:
and
1 to: 10000 do:
one is compiled to jumps, the other not and in addition creates a temp
collection.
Marcus
> I use a rc image (haven't tested in squeak). And it's the same on windows and
> linux.
>
> count := 0.
> [1 to: 10000000 do: [:i | count :=count + 1]] timeToRun." 677"
> count := 0.
> [10000000 timesRepeat: [count := count + 1]] timeToRun" 2571"
>
> If not normal, I'll open a issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Cédrick
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
