On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:

> 2009/11/22 Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>:
>> This seems related to
>> 
>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=889
>> 
>> which was only integrated in 1.1. I don't understand why we didn't put
>> this in 1.0 too.
> 
> Indeed, that looks related.
> 

I tagged it 1.0 and unclosed it.


        Marcus

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to