Dave,

My build is not headless, but it takes some time and I would like to be able to 
start it and come back later to find it done.  With my newest image, the 
pre-flight checklist drove me nuts, but it avoided three things (in succession, 
it might help to collect a nag list in one shot) that would have stopped the 
build after wasting varying amounts of time.

However, my clean test might not have been fair, because looking back, I'm not 
sure I disabled the warnings for that pass.  My message is that opening the 
help on initialization adds little value while increasing complexity of the 
setup and/or adding risk of bringing the process to a halt.  IMHO, the line 
should be removed.  I am loading command shell only to get the pipes; someone 
planning to use the shell might see this differently.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 4:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] OSProcess load

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:18:45PM -0500, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> I did get .40.  However, it seems to be much better behaved if the help is 
> not displayed.  AFAICT, removing the line avoids the interruption of what 
> should be an unattended process.
> 
> My build process now disables the deprecation warnings.

Bill,

Just so I understand, is this a problem because the extra window opening is an 
annoyance, or because the deprecation warnings (for #isMorphic) cause a 
problem, or is it because you are doing the builds with a headless image and 
this actually interrupts the process? I just want to make sure I fix the right 
problem, not just a workaround.

Thanks,
Dave


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to