On Nov 28, 2009, at 9:42 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> I would like to know if the past history of the method's versions has been
> lost by design or accident.
>
> In the core image for example it is possible only for the method Object>>at:
> an entry "yo 6/29/2004 11:39".
>
> Are we considering the implementation of Pharo as a clean slate and we'll
> start from some epoch date?
We had to make new .sources for 1.0... and even if not: the problem is that the
.changes can only
be 32MB, and that is reached fast. In 3.9, we even had to condense changes in
the middle of the release cycle.
(This is what you get from never moving on from outdated technology....)
What I would want to have is a server with all old code that than is queried by
the image...
Marcus
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
