On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Arturo Zambrano wrote: > Ok, I tried without compiz and both Pharo and X11 using 16 bpp: It works > better (still slow if compared to VW). For example: when pressing right > button on the world, it takes almost a second for the popup menu to show up. > Is that normal?
normally not > I didn't used it in another platform, I will try to give it a try under > Windows to see if speed is the same. Thanks > > Is there a particular reason for Pharo not supporting 24bpp? time and money. > I think all nvidia drivers for linux works up to 24bpp, but this depth is not > listed > in Pharo (using 16 bits looks a bit ugly) normally displayScreen only supports ... 8, 16 or 32 bits > > > regards. > art > > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Arturo Zambrano > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > Sorry, I was busy and I could not respond before. > > I found it really slow while using compiz at 24bpp, on top a of Gentoo 64 bit > box (turion 2dual core 2Ghz). > > I will use it now without compiz and let you know if it behaves better. > > Do you have any performance test that I can run so that I have "numbers" to > report? Because > the slowness could be a subjective impression as I usually run VisualWorks. > > regards > art > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi Arturo, > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arturo told me that pharo was looking slow on his machine. > > I'm using Pharo on Ubuntu 9.10 and experience no problem. Could you > please try by turning off Compiz? > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
