thanks nicolas. The real problem we have is that fixes and improving the system takes too much times and we do not allocate time to improve the tools. For the integration we made progress I'm trying to get a webdav server (but I cannot reach the guy).
I'm fighting to get some time to work on packages because we need a much better infrastructure. stef On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1527 > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1528 > > A bit longer than I thought... > At the end, I used change list instead of merger, because I can see > method timestamp and isolate my own changes faster... > That another enhancement request toward MC... > > Nicolas > > 2009/11/30 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >> Yes I know. >> >> Stef >> >> On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: >> >>> 2009/11/30 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >>>> ok so I imagine that this is already in pharo :) >>>> Excellent. >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>> >>> The only complication is that every DisplayScanner & co method was >>> reformatted in Pharo. >>> Chasing my own changes gets a bit tricky in these conditions... >>> I would need a special merger option to ignore formats (just scan code >>> and compare the sequence of tokens for example...). >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2009/11/30 Henrik Sperre Johansen <[email protected]>: >>>>>> On 30.11.2009 19:29, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Collections >>>>>>>>>>> ----------- >>>>>>>>>>> Conversion of OrderedCollection and SortedCollection to Arrays has >>>>>>>>>>> been sped up significantly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it should be ported to Pharo, I see no reason of divergence there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes and I like the fast in the sentence :) >>>>>> It's probably along the lines of what I did back in August for Pharo, >>>>>> using the array primitives directly, instead of copying the elements one >>>>>> by one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Henry >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oops, sorry, I did not noticed this one in Pharo and just rediscovered it. >>>>> My implementation is a bit shorter and yours is faster: >>>>> >>>>> asArray >>>>> "Overriden for speed" >>>>> ^array copyFrom: firstIndex to: lastIndex >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
