On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > The rejection of the Kernel, Collections, System is not about the > size, it is because of the classes they contain. There are many > classes in the system that you can't wrap without possibly harming the > system. Especially tricky are classes that are used by the system at > all times (so the result would be wrong anyway) and the coverage tools > itself (what could result in infinite recursion),
hehehe... and people always say research does not solve practical problems: Marcus Denker, Mathieu Suen, and Stéphane Ducasse. The Meta in Meta-object Architectures. In Proceedings of TOOLS EUROPE 2008, LNBIP 11 p. 218—237, Springer-Verlag, 2008 http://scg.unibe.ch/scgbib?query=Denk08b&display=abstract ... sometimes I have the feeling we learned quite a lot the last years. fundamental things, even. I think it will be interesting how the reflective kernel of Pharo will look like in 5 years. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
