tx

On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:

> Yes I can have a look.
> Otherwise, the changes are quite simple:
> 1) track senders of keys and sometimes senders of senders
> 2) identify those sending a message not understandable by an Array
> (add: remove: etc...), insert keys asSet in this case
> 3) identify thise sending a potential inefficient message (includes:)
> insert keys asSet in this case (only if includes: is in a loop!)
> 4) change code for keys
> 
> Then eventually change some chains:
> keys asSortedCollection asArray -> keys asArray sort
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> 2009/12/3 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>> Nicolas
>> 
>> I was discussing with lukas and we would be interested to get your changes 
>> to dictionary keys (Ihope that this icorrect since I'm dead)
>> We would like to integrate your changes. Do you have a basis that we could 
>> work?
>> Else we can just try in the image directly.
>> 
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to