You lost me gary :) On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> "Shared" settings will introduce another kind of package dependency... > Perhaps > there is some benefit of all settings being local to a package but > cross-linked in some way such > that the compatible preferences all change value at the same time in the > settings browsers? > > There will always be some kind of compromise, one way or the other, but it > might work ;-) > > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:50 PM > Subject: [Pharo-project] Dealing with Preferences in external packages? > > >> Now that setting is starting to get integrated (great) we will also face >> the problem >> of branching. >> For example, how do we manage that OB uses Preferences.... and that we >> don't. >> Any idea or process is welcome. >> >> Of course we can have a package full of override but this is the ultimate >> solution >> before complete fork. >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
