On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
> but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be
> something different in this new image...
>
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via
FreeType.
(Much faster, not quite as nice in details).
Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just
replace
the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a
development image.
Marcus
> 2009/12/8 laurent laffont <[email protected]>:
>> Hi,
>> I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM Squeak-3.11.3.2135.
>> See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467
>> Laurent
>>
>> 2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files
>>> I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits.
>>> Dev09.11.4 looks fine
>>> Maybe is a preference setting?
>>> Hernan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
