Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> 
> 
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:08 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>  
>> wrote:
> 
>> When you are creating your root of objects and you put symbols  
>> inside, they
>> are not put in ourPointers but in ByteArray.
>> This is due to the fact that the only object who is pointing to that  
>> symbol
>> is inside the segment ?
> 
> To be precise, the symbols are also pointed to by the symbol table,  
> but only by weak references. Since image segments use the GC mark  
> logic, these pointers are not considered.
> 
> 

Martin and I had been working towards the idea that ImageSegments should
never create non-Canonical symbols, and the user should not have to use
manual techniques to preserve symbols they are interested in keeping alive.

I ended up getting stuck however, in trying to discover what process
ImageSegment
goes through while it is installing objects - ImageSegment #install  has a
call to an
unimplemented method   #readFromFileWithSymbols  which it seems it should be
using, but isn't....(wha' the?)


install
        "This operation retrieves the segment if necessary from file storage,
installs it in memory, and replaces (using become:) all the root stubs with
the reconstructed roots of the segment."

        | newRoots |
        state = #onFile ifTrue: [self readFromFile].
        state = #onFileWithSymbols ifTrue: [self readFromFileWithSymbols.
                endMarker := segment nextObject.        "for enumeration of 
objects"
                endMarker == 0 ifTrue: [endMarker := 'End' clone]].
        (state = #active) | (state = #imported) ifFalse: [self errorWrongState].
        newRoots := self loadSegmentFrom: segment outPointers: outPointers.
        state = #imported 
                ifTrue: ["just came in from exported file"
                        arrayOfRoots := newRoots]
                ifFalse: [
                        arrayOfRoots elementsForwardIdentityTo: newRoots].
        state := #inactive.
        Beeper beepPrimitive


I think the next step in this trajectory is to trace is how the state is
getting
set - right now it is kind of a mystery...

Does this seem reasonable?

Thanks, 

Sheri


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Re-getting-rid-of-Symbol-new-tp4109230p4143090.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to