On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, GeertClaes wrote: > > I don't know the entire background and I most definitively don't want to > start something here but it looks like politics. The "Pharo Project" team > seems to have achieved more in 1 year than Squeak had in a decade - from my > point of view :)
You must be kidding. > > I am a bit confused what the idea of Squeak using PharoCore as the base (or > core) would be? Is the suggestion to have Squeak become a sub-project of Ranting about squeak on squeak-dev, that's the idea. Levente > Pharo, building on top of PharoCore in a similar way as Pharo (dev/web) > does? I wouldn't think the Squeak team is willing to handover the "core" to > Pharo, otherwise there would never have been a Pharo project in the first > place .... or am I barking up the wrong tree? Anyhow, better package > management and code sharing (simpler) would be great :) > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Fwd-squeak-dev-Stuff-tp4174205p4174266.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
