On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, George Herolyants wrote: > 2009/12/18 Levente Uzonyi <le...@elte.hu>: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, George Herolyants wrote: >>> And native basic dialogs may be helpful too, to not reinvent the wheel >>> (aka FileBrowser :). >> >> At first sight this idea seems to be cool, but it's not. FileBrowser is >> not a "reinvented wheel", it's really useful in a closed environments like >> smalltalk. FileBrowser has the same features on all platforms while >> native dialogs don't. > > I may be wrong, but I think the basic features are the same. And the > purpose of dialogs to ask user and return its answer to the system. > And this feature is shared by all the dialogs. If we're talking about > selecting files, such kind of dialogs at least in windows and linux > have almost the same feature set and are more usual for people.
In that sense, yes the dialogs have similar features, but FileBrowser is more than a dialog. > >> Some platforms don't even have a graphical UI, would >> you open a terminal in the image on those? > > I may not understand something, but is it possible to use Pharo's GUI > on such platforms? > Sure, start the vm with: -vm display=none. Then use RFB to connect to the image, we use several such images. Levente > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
