On of the idea is to use glamour to experiment new browsers and probably to
write it from scratch when we know what is really good.
Ideally
I like the multiple method showing of whisker but not the rest
david implemented that in OB.
I like the fact that O2 supports the view of class extension view per
packages
Now I avoid to talk about browsers because we do not have somebody in
the community
working heavily on that beside david and david may leave once he will
finish his PhD.
Now OB metamodel does not support tree and make it difficult to have something
like the class comment
visible close to the class definition.
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:47 PM, GeertClaes wrote:
>
>
> George Herolyants-3 wrote:
>>
>> Though I think WhiskerBrowser still covers the above use case better.
>> Unfortunately it doesn't run on Pharo.
>>
>
> Maybe WhiskerBrowser can be created using Glamour?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Default-code-browser-tp4183317p4186933.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
