I think that something like it could be arrange ... instead of #requires:, there's be #rejects:
Dale ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: | good idea! | Dale? Do we have xor for configuration ;) ? | | On Dec 20, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: | | >> I think it would be better to have ConfigurationOfRefactoring and | two | >> other: ConfigurationOfOB and ConfigurationOfO2, which have the | former | >> as a required project (and IIUC it was your first intention, | right?). | >> This will reduce duplication of dependencies between projects. | > | > O2 breaks OB, if both are loaded. I suggest that the configurations | > should trigger a conflict when somebody tries to load both. | > | > Lukas | > | > -- | > Lukas Renggli | > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch | > | > _______________________________________________ | > Pharo-project mailing list | > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
