sure no problem. Lukas. I sent the mail because this is an important point. I think that we should also understand what is a good amount of time between two releases.
On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >> Lukas, is there a particular reason why you want/need your stuff to >> work also with 1.1? > > The initial trigger for this discussion was Stef asking me to use > #chooseOrRequestFrom: for creating protocols in OB. This method was a > recently added to morphic in Pharo 1.1 and is used in the old ST-80 > browser to create new method protocols with one click. I would love to > add it to OB, but since this requires Pharo 1.1 I cannot. > >> I don't think it makes sense to adapt and fix the external packages >> that are in Pharo (of which you maintain a few) as long as PharoCore >> is in alpha state. > > I do not complain, I completely agree with the Pharo development > process. It is great what you are doing. > > I was telling Stef that I cannot take advantage of the cool new > dialogs right now, but only when there is a release candidate for > Pharo 1.1. Also I was hoping that I could use Helvetia directly in > Pharo 1.1, maybe together with a proposal for making the compiler > tool-chain easier to plug-in. However since Helvetia depends on RB and > OB that would mean that I had to fork these two projects. Something I > cannot do right now. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
