On Dec 25, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > 2009/12/25 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >> Hi >> >> I was wondering if it would make sense to have >> Point name >> Point class name >> both returning a symbol and not in one case a symbol and the other a >> string. >> > > To my understanding, there's only classes which obliged to be > identified by name. > Metaclasses don't need to have one, and actually free to answer > anything they want.
I do not think so and be consistent would be good > >> Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
