In SBE we pay extreme attention between message and methods.
You send messages, execute a method. 


> Adrian Kuhn wrote:
>> Martin McClure <mar...@...> writes:
>> 
>>> Actually, I usually do prefer to use first person when writing Smalltalk
>>> comments. I find that anthropomorphizing objects helps to think in an
>>> object-oriented way.
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for all the answers so far!
>> 
>> One of the things that keep confusing me is whether the I refers to the 
>> class,
>> the object or (in a method comment) to the method or even the method
>> activation? For example in Randal's example, there it is the the behavior
>> *class* speaking in first person. Whereas to my understanding in
>> *object*-oriented programming the objects should talk be first person (not 
>> the
>> classes).
>> 
>> Even more confusing, I have also seen comments where the it was the object or
>> the methods. Or most confusing, an amalgamation of both, as eg in "I return 
>> my
>> first element" where to be precise the method activation returns the first
>> element of the object. So shouldn't it either be "(When activiated) Returns 
>> my
>> first element" or "I return the first element of my reciever"? 
>> 
>> This is not an academic example. When I started to write comments for SUnit, 
>> I
>> got actually confused. When writing (instance/class) methods comments, to 
>> whom
>> does the "I" refer to?   
>> 
> 
> Good points. Existing comments are not always consistent.
> 
> In my opinion, "I" should always refer to an object. Which object?
> "Self" within the current context. In an instance-side method comment,
> "I" is the receiver of the message. In a class-side method comment, "I"
> is the class. In a class comment, it's a little less clear, but probably
> "I" should be the class in that case.
> 
> I'd probably write the above example imperatively, something like
> "Answer my first element".
> 
> In Smalltalk, I also tend to prefer "answer" over "return", and I tend
> to talk about "messages" instead of "methods" unless explicitly dealing
> with method objects.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to