> I don't think that growing a Set is faster than growing an Array, then >>> converting it to a Set, but let's see the numbers: >>> >>> "Prepare an array with 10000 elements, each element is an array with one >>> integer. 10% is duplicate." >> >> This is something I can understand. So we will fix that. > > This is rather a matter of memory. The use case in Moose back then used to be > closer to 10 million objects with a set of eventual size of 100 element. So > the intend is to avoid allocating 40 MB of memory when all you need is a set > of 100 elements. So at least in Moose, you should keep it :)
Context :) Thanks. I will add a comment to flatCollectAsSet: going in that direction. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
