Geert, I will say that there is definite interest on our part to port Moose/Glamour to GemStone. Cross platform tools are very interesting, because they provide a smooth transition into GemStone, when the need for GemStone arises.
Dale ----- "Geert Claes" <[email protected]> wrote: | Stéphane Ducasse wrote: | > | >> Just wondering if anyone here knows about Cincom's WebVelocity | Seaside | >> based | >> web development environment. | > | > Yes we got brain-washed :) | > | >> Are there any open source Pharo alternatives? | > | > May be Seaside-XUL or Glamour-Seaside. since Glamour browser can be | > displayed in a web browser. | > I imagine that in the future we may have just seaside loaded and | program | > in a web browser if we want. | > | > | | Yep, I am very interested into a smalltalk web app IDE for a while | now. | Although I really do like the concept behind WebVelocity, I have to | say that | I am not too keen on the tool as it is now. | | I also just started looking at Moose/Glamour after stumbling on it | recently. | In such an IDE, the project and component sharing is instrumental as | it will | boost innovation. Maybe Gemstone will come up with a Pharo based | alternative :) | -- | View this message in context: | http://n2.nabble.com/Pharo-based-Web-Velocity-tp4240702p4241843.html | Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | [email protected] | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
