Hello,
Yes... we need to control the amount of work invested. And we need to be
clear when we reach a point where we just can't provide something.
So I vote for not having an official web image.
Marcus
On Jan 5, 2010, at 9:11 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> I too believe that is the best choice at this moment.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 5 Jan 2010, at 20:15, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Let us be pragmatic and focused.
>>
>> I would say that I would prefer to have one single pharo-dev image
>> than a middle pharo-dev image and a pharo-web.
>> We can focus on pharo-dev
>> And let lukas ship a one-click seaside image.
>>
>> With the time the pharo-dev will support easy configuration to load
>> seaside
>> aida
>> and a lot more so we will just offer one good image and let people
>> decide.
>> so I would focus on our customers first :)
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
