On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Mariano
> >
> > I think that projects should publish in their repository a 
> > ConfigurationOfXXX
> > and when this is stable copy it to MetacelloRepository.
> >
> > I agree more or less. Depends what you are meaning with stable. It is ok to 
> > commit ConfigurationOfXXX in your own repository until you have a first 
> > version. I just did that with SqueakDBX, but for the rest of the projects, 
> > I commit to local repo until it worked. And then, directly to 
> > MetacelloRepository. Of course, each person can do whatever they want.
> >
> >  Then, you can directly commit it to MetacelloRepository. However, after 
> > that, the ConfigurationOfXXX can perfectly be unstable, using another 
> > version. For example, if you take ConfigurationOfPharo and load the version 
> > 1.0, it will work. Howver, it won't with 1.1 because I am still working.
> 
> my point is that we should pay attention and have a limited set of 
> configuration that are working for each release.
> I imagine
> 
>        ConfigurationOfMoose4-Pharo1.0
>        ConfigurationOfMoose4.1-Pharo1.0
>        ConfigurationOfMoose4.1-Pharo1.0-105005
>        ConfigurationOfMoose4.1-Pharo1.1
> 
> Not unstable version. Commit in the pharoTaskForces if this helps you.
> 
> 
> Stef: On Friday we can see it together because that's not the idea of 
> Metacello. You will have only ONE class ConfigurationOfMoose which will have 
> different versions. Then you will be able to evaluate:
> 
>  (ConfigurationOfMoose project version: '4.1') load

ok 

>  
> or whatever...
> 
> But anyway, it will be better to see it together.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mariano 
>  
> 
> >
> > Ok. No problem for me. My own "advice" is to put it *also* in 
> > MetacelloRepository.
> 
> But we should get some guidelines else soon this will be a mess.
> I suggest that we get a list of working stable configuration all the other 
> should be moved into PharoTreated or something like that.
> 
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to