I think that refactoring the baseline so the common requirements are common and the specific requirements that differ are made conditional upon the platform.
It is entirely possible that the bulk of the baseline will be common (differing only on which repository is used). then of course the version will be completely different for each platform. I'm working in thie area, so I think that I will create a sample baseline that you can look at and if it makes sense to you you can fold into the configuration. Dale ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[email protected]> wrote: | On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Dale Henrichs | <[email protected]>wrote: | | > Mariano, | > | > That's just fine ... make the changes that you need to make and I'll | adapt | > that configuration for GLASS and Squeak (Gemtools). | > | > | Thanks Dale. And regardless my intention to let you know this so that | it is | all right with you, what do you think the way I am managing this ? | So far, I create a new pair of baseline/version, but maybe you have a | better | idea. | | Cheers | | Mariano | | | > Dale | > | > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[email protected]> wrote: | > | > | Dale: after some discussions in Pharo mailing list, the community | > | wants to | > | use the Lukas repository for OB instead of wiresong. | > | | > | I don't know the impact it makes to you, and I don't know the best | way | > | to | > | manage this kind of situations. | > | | > | Right now, I create a new version and baselind to | > | ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser that maps to Lukas repo and I change | a | > | little | > | the dependencies, and, of course, the versions. | > | | > | Any thougths about this? | > | | > | Cheers | > | | > | Mariano | > | | > | On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dale Henrichs | > | <[email protected]>wrote: | > | | > | > just fine..thanks | > | > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[email protected]> wrote: | > | > | > | > | On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Dale Henrichs | > | > | <[email protected]>wrote: | > | > | | > | > | > | > | > | > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[email protected]> | wrote: | > | > | > | > | > | > | So far, I created: ConfigurationOfNewInspector, | > | > | > | ConfigurationOfOCompletion, | > | > | > | ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser, | > | ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras, | > | > | > | ConfigurationOfPharoSound, | ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser, | > | > | > | ConfigurationOfShout , and......ConfigurationOfPharo!!! | > | > | > | > | > | > Mariano, | > | > | > | > | > | > I'm working on a ConfigurationOfOmneBrowser that works on | both | > | > | Squeak and | > | > | > Pharo (and ultimately GemStone ...). | > | > | > | > | > | > Would you prefer that I start a new baseline/version or | just | > | > | overwrite 1.0? | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | Hi Dale. Good we are working in OB. This weekend / next-week | I | > | want | > | > | to | > | > | create a PharoDev image with OB so maybe I would rather if | you | > | can | > | > | create a | > | > | new baseline (taking 1.0 as a base) and if you want, later we | can | > | > | "merge" if | > | > | necessary. | > | > | | > | > | What do you think ? Is this ok for you ? | > | > | | > | > | | > | > | > I lean towards overwriting, especially this early in the | > | process, | > | > | but I | > | > | > want your opinion. | > | > | > | > | > | > Dale | > | > | > | > | > | > _______________________________________________ | > | > | > Pharo-project mailing list | > | > | > [email protected] | > | > | > | > | | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > | > | > | > | > | > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
