ok guys run the tests and send fixes :) On Jan 16, 2010, at 3:11 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Em 15/01/2010 19:48, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> escreveu: > >> Hi guys >> may be I'm wrong but I have the impression that fixing tests as >> soon as they are broken in the Unstable branch could be better. Now >> doing that may stall our energy. > > I think it would reduce the [apparent] speed of new functionality, but > not "stall our energy" which I surmise is to have a cool but as bug > free as possible Pharo Smalltalk. > >> So what do you think? > > Doing this way, as some red tests get on the pile without resolution > we can get more attention to the issues. > > It's a mixture of the Toyota process with a Kanban for squashing the > bugs! > >> May be an alternate process is to make progress and to do green >> test session from time to time. > > Except if we could be _so_ assertive about the non importance of some > of the non passing tests, I think the time to time should be as short > as today! > > OK, as a concession could we try to have these gates about every two > weeks? > > -- > Cesar Rabak > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
