Soon there will be a chapter on a nice book on that :)
> Levente and Lukas, > > You both agree that this is not a bug, them we have to ascertain that > 'average Smalltalker' will understand that using closures in Pharo changes > the Smalltalk language definition. > > > > Em 17/01/2010 06:57, Lukas Renggli < [email protected] > escreveu: > > >> I believe this is a bug. > > That's the correct behavior. This is exactly how closures should > behave. The variable declaration is outside the block you store thus > one variable slot is shared among multiple block definitions inside. > See ClosureTests for more examples of that behavior. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
