In moose page it says:
"the same version can also be loaded into a Pharo Development image by
executing the following code:
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'Moose';
addPackage: 'ConfigurationOfMoose';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfMoose)
project version: '4.0-beta.4') load. "
On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, I am okay to have them in a separate package.
>
>
> Yes, I would really prefer this option is nobody discover that they are
> really needed in the core. I would like to hear other opinions, thus.
>
> BTW, you usually build your Moose images based in PharoCore or PharoDev?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 19 Jan 2010, at 07:20, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> > Maybe I even would like to remove the whole package 'ST80-
> > Paths'.....but, going step by step, I would remove Arc, Circle and
> > Spline. As far as I could see, they don't have more senders than
> > their own examples. And they are not even working. For example, Arc
> > and Circule shows the same. Evaluate:
> >
> > Arc example
> > Circle example
> > Spline example
> >
> > So, what do you think? We break everything if we do this? opinions?
> >
> > Maybe we can put them in PharoMorphicExtras :)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Mariano
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> <ATT00001..txt>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
