I would not put the stexupery as first vm because the squeak one should be more tested.
Stef On Jan 19, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Ok...so: pharo exupery vm as FTPlugin compiled and 3.11. doesn't. And both > are closure-enable. > > Does someone have a compiled squeak-unix-vm with FTPlugin ? because > otherwise, I think I would rather to put again Exupery as the default one. > > Opinions? > > 2010/1/19 George Herolyants <[email protected]> > So, here are the results (see attachments). On the background of each > pharo screenshot you can see the version number of the vm, and command > line I used to run pharo image with this vm. > As you can see results are far better for the pharo-exupery-linux-vm > (which means 0.15.2f), because it has FTPlugin compiled, and > squeak-unix-vm (which means 3.11.3-2135) hasn't. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
