On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Michael Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:

> if you follow the send into CodeLoader you will see fileIn sent at the
> end of installSourceFile:. All the security manager stuff and request
> stuff can be dropped so just try and copy the minimum that you need
> into the class.


Yes, I thought the same.


>  Also, the startup at login can be dropped as well,
> since the class can be activated or deactivated by removing it from
> the startup list.


ahh cool :)


>   I'll take a look later on.
>
>
Excellent. I created http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1854
I wanted to put you in cc but I didn't find you in the list :(

Thanks

Mariano



> cheers,
> Mike
>
> 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Michael Roberts <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> we can remove it but we need to keep the ability to load scripts from
> >> the command line.
> >>
> >
> > Mike: Thanks for you answer. I really don't know too much of CodeLoader,
> > that's why I ask. I checked that about running from command line. You are
> > right.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> so, your code is fine but you can't zap CodeLoader since it's still
> >> referenced for the load. It would be easier just to make a new class
> >> that only loads scripts from the command line, and zap the rest.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, maybe that's a better idea. However, I think that maybe we even
> don't
> > need a new class. Maybe we can do something like this:
> >
> > startUpAfterLogin
> >     | scriptName loader isUrl |
> >     self readDocumentAtStartup ifTrue: [
> >         scriptName := (SmalltalkImage current getSystemAttribute: 2)
> > ifNil:[''].
> >         scriptName := scriptName convertFromSystemString..
> >         ]
> >     ifFalse: [ scriptName := '' ].
> >
> >     scriptName isEmptyOrNil
> >         ifTrue:[^ self].
> >
> >     self loadAndInstallSources: scriptName.
> >
> >
> > And then, we define ProjectLauncher >> loadAndInstallSources: aScriptName
> >
> > Here we should do a fileIn, but I am not sure how to do that. Can you
> help
> > me ?
> >
> > What do you think ? Is it worth this or keep CodeLoader ?   I reall don't
> > LIKE AT ALL to use something that depends on HTTPLoader to do that...wtf
> > ???  Look CodeLoader >> createRequestFor:
> >
> > Please, take into account I am very newbie with this stuff, so maybe
> there
> > are a lot of problems I am not seeing. I just asked :)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Mariano
> >
> >
> >> cheers
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> 2010/1/19 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>:
> >> > So....we will remove CodeLoader then ?   This is the moment to speak
> :)
> >> >
> >> > I ask about this because I am trying to analize who uses ImageSegments
> >> > and
> >> > all that stuff in the code and see how easily or good is to remove
> >> > ImageSegment to a separate package. And, CodeLoader uses ImageSegment.
> >> >
> >> > As far as I looked, the only user or CodeLoader, as Michael said is
> >> > ProjectLauncher >> startUpAfterLogin
> >> > Which....I think it will also die in a moment if Project will die
> >> > too....
> >> >
> >> > Anyway, but do you think about changing startUpAfterLogin  to this:
> >> >
> >> > startUpAfterLogin
> >> >     | scriptName loader isUrl |
> >> >     self readDocumentAtStartup ifTrue: [
> >> >         scriptName := (SmalltalkImage current getSystemAttribute: 2)
> >> > ifNil:[''].
> >> >         scriptName := scriptName convertFromSystemString.
> >> >         scriptName isEmpty ifFalse:[
> >> >             "figure out if script name is a URL by itself"
> >> >             isUrl := (scriptName asLowercase beginsWith:'http://')
> or:[
> >> >                     (scriptName asLowercase beginsWith:'file://') or:[
> >> >                     (scriptName asLowercase beginsWith:'ftp://')]].
> >> >             isUrl ifFalse:[scriptName := 'file:',scriptName]].
> >> >         . ]
> >> >     ifFalse: [ scriptName := '' ].
> >> >
> >> >     scriptName isEmptyOrNil
> >> >         ifTrue:[^ self].
> >> >     loader := CodeLoader new.
> >> >     loader loadSourceFiles: (Array with: scriptName).
> >> >     loader installSourceFiles.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> ok we got convinced :)
> >> >>
> >> >> On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:20 AM, John M McIntosh wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Ah well yes Michael suffered thru managing, testing, and working
> with
> >> >> > all those browsers  & plugins.
> >> >> > I suffered thru trying to figure out how it all worked...  At least
> >> >> > on
> >> >> > the mac.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Here's the current issue, because:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Microsoft shafted netscape by abandoning the netscape API, then
> >> >> > shafted
> >> >> > apple by not providing an alternative
> >> >> > we had the strange mixture of  a solution for os-x, windows, X11.
> >> >> > Then
> >> >> > of course Microsoft IE on macintosh
> >> >> > would change behaviour from version to version to screw with
> FireFox
> >> >> > &
> >> >> > Mozilla etc.  Let alone worrying about Opera which
> >> >> > kinda worked.  Fortunately Microsoft abandon the Mac browser
> market,
> >> >> >  and Apple introduced Safari which again was slightly different.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now on 10.6 we had this problem an abandon API for plugins, that
> >> >> > needed
> >> >> > to move forward, also into the 64bit world.
> >> >> > So Apple changed things again to either let you run Safari in 32bit
> >> >> > using old plugins (busted), or using a modified 64bit plugins api,
> >> >> > but
> >> >> > not both at the same time.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The words busted, non-existant, abandon, (implied ugly),  appear
> >> >> > quite a
> >> >> > few times in the sentences above. Also on every
> >> >> > browser version change, or operating system major version change
> >> >> > something was just slightly funky  enough to bring down
> >> >> > the house of cards.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So, time is better spent in getting 64bit squeak working, since
> there
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > plenty of hours still needed to fixup all the plugins,
> >> >> > and check that the VM is actually sane...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 2010-01-11, at 1:59 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 1/11/2010 10:58 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> forget squeak/pharo in the browser.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> for those not in the know:
> >> >> >> I'm one of the poor guys who actually spent a *lot* of time making
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> possible ;-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Michael
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >>
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> ===========================================================================
> >> >> > John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>   Twitter:
> >> >> >  squeaker68882
> >> >> > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.
> >> >> >  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> ===========================================================================
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Pharo-project mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> >
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Pharo-project mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to