The problem is in ConfigurationOfSpy class >> ensureMetacello

That method is wrong (it is old). You have to updated to something like
this:

http://code.google.com/p/metacello/wiki/EnsureMetacello

Cheers

MAriano

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote:

> I also got the warnings and an error in the end.
>
> Adrian
>
> On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:06 , Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> > Strange, I tried in a 10505 and I got no warning. I will try later
> > today.
> >
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> >> I tried it in a PharoCore 1.0 10506 and I get a lot of deprecation
> >> warnings for gofer addPackage:, addVersion:
> >>
> >> The method Gofer addVersion: has been deprecated.
> >> Instead of #addVersion: simply use #version:
> >>
> >> Select Proceed to continue, or close this window to cancel the
> >> operation.
> >>
> >> I pressed proceed and then I got:
> >>
> >>
> >> MetacelloGoferPackage(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #setName.
> >>
> >> Is this for 1.0, what version?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> To invoke the profiler, use the following template:
> >>> ProfilingPackageSpy viewProfiling: [ "YOUR CODE" ]  inPackage:
> >>> 'YourPackageName'
> >>> ProfilingPackageSpy viewProfiling: [ "YOUR CODE" ]
> >>> inPackagesMatching: 'PackageName*'
> >>>
> >>> Replace "YOUR CODE" by an expression. Some examples are provided in
> >>> the class ProfilingPackageSpy (method category 'example'). You can
> >>> find profilings of Mondrian, Glamour, Moose/CAnalyzer, O2.
> >>> The profiling of Mondrian looks like this:
> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >>> ProfilingPackageSpy
> >>>             viewProfiling: [
> >>>                     | view |
> >>>                     view := MOViewRenderer new.
> >>>                     view nodes: (1 to: 100) forEach: [:each | view
> nodes: (1 to:
> >>> 100)].
> >>>                     view root applyLayout
> >>>             ]
> >>>             inPackage: 'Mondrian'
> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >>>
> >>> There are two things you should keep in mind:
> >>> - "YOUR CODE" will be executed twice. The first time with message
> >>> Tally, then the second time with the full instrumentation. The second
> >>> execution should not be impacted by the first execution.
> >>> - You cannot instrument the whole image. I need more time to make
> >>> this
> >>> happens. Therefore, you cannot provide '*' to inPackagesMatching:
> >>>
> >>> How to read the picture:
> >>>  - big rectangle are classes
> >>>  - edges represent class inheritance
> >>>  - inner rectangles are methods:
> >>>    * height = total time that the method has been executed
> >>>    * width = number of time the method has been executed
> >>>    * color = number of different receiver: white = the method has
> >>> been executed on 1 receiver. black = many receivers
> >>>
> >>> You can do a right-click on a method, and select viewInvocation. This
> >>> opens a second view that show the execution flow. A different mapping
> >>> of metrics is used:
> >>>  - rectangle = methods
> >>>  - edges = invocation (upper invokes below)
> >>>  - gray color = method that always return 'self'. It corresponds to
> >>> void methods in Java or C++. It is therefore likely that the method
> >>> performs a side effect
> >>>  - yellow color = method that always returns the same value for a
> >>> particular object
> >>>  - width and height are as in the first visualization
> >>>
> >>> Keep in mind that you mind encounter a freeze of your image if you
> >>> instrument sensitive methods.
> >>>
> >>> I would be sincerely delighted to have experience report on this.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Alexandre
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Miguel Cobá
> >> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to