On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:

> 2010/1/20 Gary Chambers <[email protected]>:
>> A good few months back I noticed similarly inexplicable slowness (that I
>> mistakenly ascribed to some changes...). Went away after image
>> save/restart... maybe that kind of thing has happened.
>>
>
> Well i just started a fresh image, didn't done anything yet with it,
> just opened a browser..
>
> But now, i tried to reproduce the same, by starting a very same image,
> and its magically behaves much faster..

Open a browser, select Morph, don't select a category (-- all --), select 
the first method and press the down key.


Levente

>
>
>> Regards, Gary
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Igor Stasenko" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] A dog-slow browser
>>
>>
>>> 2010/1/20 Gary Chambers <[email protected]>:
>>>> Super quick here... (1.1 latest updates, admittedly a quad-core, only one
>>>> used though...)
>>>
>>> I have to take my words back.
>>> Strange, very strange.. its now magically started working quite fast..
>>> As i said, first time i run it, it was flickering the hourglass mouse
>>> cursor each time i switching between methods in browser.
>>> What was it? And why it disappears? Any suggestions?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Gary
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Marcus Denker" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:47 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] A dog-slow browser
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/1/20 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please, don't take it as a offense, but as a constructive critics :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pharo-core browser is awfully slooow!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pharo core? Or Pharo dev?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> core
>>>>>
>>>>> It should not... it uses the fast fonts, no syntax highligting...
>>>>> In essense, it should be the same performance than Squeak 3.9.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it slower than that? I can not see any problem (the curse of a fast
>>>>> machine?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to